Forrest Cameranesi Geek of all Trades

Summary

In the preceding essays I have laid out in detail all of my philosophical views. I will now go over them again more quickly in a high-level summary:

Work to Philosophy

Per my pragmatist metaphilosophy, all practical endeavors have at least a distant instrumental use for philosophy, in that all practical work can be analyzed in terms of using some tool to do some job, where:

The job of philosophy is thus to seek wisdom, meaning a way of discerning better from worse answers to questions about both reality and morality, giving the physical and ethical sciences the tools they need to do their jobs of enabling the creation of further tools and jobs with which to drive all manner of practical work.

Per my essay on action, the possibility of success at any endeavor requires trying, but assuming either that success is impossible or that it is guaranteed means that there is no reason to try, and so renders success impossible. We must therefore always act according to a tacit assumption that success is possible, but not guaranteed.

Commensurablism

Doing philosophy successfully thus requires that we assume what I call commensurablism, or universalist criticism, which is the position that, to questions about both reality and morality:

Universalism, being the commitment to there being universal answers to all meaningful questions, is the negation of what I term "relativism", which in turn encompasses:

Criticism, being the commitment to always being open to critically questioning anything, is the negation of what I term "dogmatism", which in turn encompasses:

Universalism demands always allowing the initial possibility that some proposed answer might be the correct one rather than rejecting every proposal at the outset, a position I term "liberalism"; equivalently, rejecting relativism demands also rejecting what I term "cynicism", which in turn encompasses:

Criticism demands appealing always to experiential phenomena to judge proposed answers to questions without appeals to faith, a position I term "phenomenalism"; equivalently, rejecting dogmatism demands also rejecting what I term "transcendentalism", which in turn encompasses:

All of that in turn demands a philosophy of language that:

Action

Phenomenal universalism, which is to say the rejection of both transcendentalism and relativism, demands:

Critical liberalism, the rejection of both dogmatism and cynicism, demands:

Having read through my philosophy in detail once, and again reading through this high-level summary, I recommend reading this entire Codex through once more in detail with this bigger picture in mind, to better see how each smaller piece fits together into the unified whole that I hope you now understand.


Back to the Introduction.